brandonrobison.net

Hi all,

A handful of classmates and I have banded together to start a new blog. Its primary discussion will revolve around economic, political and social issues, but will undoubtedly also cover pop culture, religion, philosophy, and a myriad of other topics.

I don’t plan to get rid of my personal blog, and I’m not sure how I will divide up posts between it and this new one I’m involved in. So, just plan on checking them both! The worst thing that can happen is you might learn something.

So, why not head over to Unconstrained Optimism?

Yesterday I voted in the Virginia election. There were only five (or was it six?) positions to vote for. I want to tell you all a little about my experience voting.

First off, I only voted for three of the positions: governor, attorney general, and house of delegates. I guess that last one is like the state legislature or something? I really have no idea.

Well, leading up to the election, I was unsure as to whether I should vote for the D or the R guys. On the one hand, D is pretty close to B, which is the first letter of my first name. But on the other hand, R *is* R, the first letter of my last name. In the end, I chose to go for the R guys, and for reasons other than the first-letter-of-my-name thing.

Bob McDonnell’s competitor had put signs up all over Fairfax saying something to the effect that Bob wanted to get rid of schools. You might know I’m not a fan of public schools, so if Bob is against them, he’s my guy. I just don’t understand why his Creigh Deeds would have gone around paying for a positive advertising campaign for his election competitor.

I voted for Bob McDonnell, and he won by 6%. It’s a good thing I voted for him, because without my vote, he would have undoubtedly lost.

The race for attorney general had a similar story. The guy running against Cuccinelli (I don’t even remember his (or her) name) has been playing ads all over TV saying how Cuccinelli once said that he wouldn’t enforce laws he didn’t agree with. Wow! What a strong endorsement!

Seriously, these Democrats are horrible at the PR game. You guys are supposed to advertise negative qualities about your competitors (or at least talk up the good points of your own business). No wonder Republicans owned the elections last night.

Well anyway, I voted for Cuccinelli. This was a much closer race — Cuccinelli only won by 1%! My vote really counted here.

So in case you’re not keeping track, my vote has counted in two of two cases.

However, there is still the general assembly election. There was no R in this race, only a D. Having run as a third party candidate in the past, I can empathize with the lower-ranked parties. So I voted for the Green Party candidate, Anna Choi. I mean, I like the color green, so why not? And I can tell by her name that she’s Asian, and I like Asians.

Furthermore, her website claims she is a fiscal conservative… which in conjunction with being a Green means she probably just favors raising taxes really high to offset government spending. But that’s ok, because I learned recently from doing my macro homework that in a Keynesian world (which we live in), an equal increase in government spending and taxes results in a net positive effect on the economy. What’s not to love about this kind of fiscal conservatism?

Unfortunately, Anna lost her bid to serve us. It went to the D.

But I refuse to let one bad race prevent me from enjoying my democratic freedoms in this country and knowing that, at the very least, my vote counted in two of the three races.

A little over a month ago I posed a question about gun rights vs. health care rights. I liked all the comments on that post, but none of them were how I would have answered the question.

So why is there a right to bear arms in the Constitution, but not a right to health care?

The answer, very simply, lies in property rights. If one views the Bill of Rights through a lens of property rights, we see that almost every Amendment is a guarantee of a private property right. An “arm” is merely a piece of property, hence it can be privately owned. But how can health care be privately owned? How is it property?

In a free world (or free market), property is produced and exchanged voluntarily. So my owning of something does not forcefully impose anything on any one else. For example, I can own a gun, and my right to own that gun does not infringe on any other individual in any way. The same can be said about other types of private property: cars, clothing, iPods. Phrased even more simply, no one is harmed, forced, or imposed upon to provide me with private property: all private property is provided to me through voluntary actions.

Health care as a right, on the other hand, does not fit this description. If I wake up tomorrow and suddenly have a “right” to health care, it would mean that some doctor or doctors would necessarily be forced to provide that health care to me. At the point where I have a “right” to health care, voluntary action will have been supplanted by force.

Lorem Ipsum is a sort of made up language. Well, not really a language. It is “simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry” and also commonly used for people designing websites before they’ve been given any real content that will go on the site they’re designing. It’s designed to look like English (actually, looks more like the Latin language). Blah blah blah. Read more about Lorem Ipsum at lipsum.com.

I stumbled onto a song called Lorem Ipsum last night and I’ve listened to it dozens of times since. It was composed by Jake “virt” Kaufman, a video game and long time scene composer. virt is an incredible arranger and composer… really, listen to practically any of his songs and keep in mind he programmed the sounds with a computer, and you can’t help but be amazed.

In this latest song of his that I’m obsessed with, he has combined orchestra, rock, a singing choir, and a strange vocaloid together. But even more amazing (to me) is the lyrics of the song: It’s just Lorem Ipsum! Check out the song now!

Several weeks ago I ordered a book from Amazon for one of my classes. When I got it, and I realized it was missing pages 19-51. So I sent Amazon an email, and they sent me a new copy the next day (as in, I received a replacement *the day after I reported the problem*… Amazon FTW). Unfortunately, it had the same problem. So I asked around and found out other classmates had the same problem (ordering it from other bookstores, even).

I decided to contact the publisher, MIT Press:

I have ordered two separate copies of Lectures on Macroeconomics by Blanchard and Fischer (ISBN 0-262-02283-4) and both copies are missing pages 19-51. Other classmates are having the same problem. What can be done to fix this? It seems that multiple booksellers have the same faulty printings…

A couple days later, they replied with this:

Dear Brandon:  I have checked with the press, and they can’t seem to think of a particular book off hand.  Perhaps you can try Amazon.com.  I’m sending the link to hopefully help in the search.
thank you,
____

<http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=women+law+enforcement&x=0&y=0>

The punch line to this story is found by clicking on the link they sent me.

Buy a gallon of milk from Amazon.com for $69.99. Really, check this stuff out.

Specifically, see 1) the customer pictures, 2) what other products customers are buying, and 3) the customer reviews.

Recently, a friend posted a comment on her Facebook to the effect that no one should die from lack of health care, and furthermore, no one should go broke from health care expenses. Discussion ensued, and one person posed the question, “Why is there a right to bear arms in the Constitution, but not a right to health care?”

I’ll post my answer in a couple days. In the meantime, please post your thoughts on this question in the comments.

I am now twittering, I guess. Find me here.

For those of you who read my blog but not Ashley’s, go check out her latest post to read about our adventures this past week. I thought about writing a travelog, but decided Ashley’s done a more-than-adequate job for the both of us.