Mar 10 2009

The Church beat me to the punch

Several days ago I started receiving Facebook messages, emails, group invites, etc., regarding an upcoming episode of the HBO show Big Love. I wanted to write a post about how stupid it was that Church members were getting all uppity about it, partly because 1) I knew I was right, and 2) I knew my comments would make Church members even more uppity, and that’s always entertaining.

Unfortunately (for me), the Church came out with a statement solidifying many of my own thoughts. So now that they’ve beaten me to it, it’s pointless to write out a reasoned explanation for why the “Hate on Big Love” movement was retarded.

(No offense to those of you who sent me invites. People can become misguided when they get defensive about their beliefs.)

To read the press release, go here.


Feb 26 2009

Ugh. So tired of all the inane Mormon ads on the internet

This isn’t even the first of these I’ve seen.

Mary: Every “act of God” seems so destructive…
Sue: What about those people who jumped in 2 help?
Mary: Are U saying God told them 2?
Sue: Maybe…

Is the Church targeting morons? I understand marketing to some degree, so let me just say, this is a bad campaign. Family Guy frequently makes fun of things like this by having “stupid” people conversing and saying one to another things like, “Look at him. He’s sitting casually backwards in his chair like us. I can relate to this guy. Let’s listen!”

But seriously, why is this bad? While it might appeal to lower lifeforms, people with two cents of intelligence will think, “Wow, that’s just dumb,” and be turned off. Honestly, the only people who type like that are 15-year-old girls.

A better strategy would be to use proper spelling/grammar. Even a stupid 15-year-old girl can decipher legitimate English, while the rest of the populace will also be able to focus on the message of the ad instead of the retarded way in which it’s written.


Mar 9 2008

Consider US history, especially since WWI

Both the Book of Mormon and the Bible provided ample evidence as to what can happen to a nation that allows “statolatry” [the worship of the state] to become the national religion. And as will be seen, the roots of this tendency can be traced directly back to the War in Heaven.

In the Old World, the Israelites also apostatized politically from their divinely revealed system of representative government, based on the immutable rule of law. As they demanded to have a king, Samuel the prophet tried to convince them otherwise. He warned that the king would conscript their sons into aggressive empire-expanding military campaigns (1 Samuel 8:11-12), and because of the lack of male workers, the women would be forced into the workplace as “confectionaries, cooks and bakers” (1 Samuel 8:13). Heavy taxation of property would follow in order to fund the ever-expanding Satanocracy [government founded on principles of Satan, eg. Force] (1 Samuel 8:14-15, 17), followed by state-mandated slavery (1 Samuel 8:16-17). Once all of that happened, Samuel prophesied that the people would cry out in that day for deliverance but, because of their king which they had chosen, the Lord would not hear them (1 Samuel 8:18).

King Mosiah … warned the Nephites what would happen to them if they continued to have kings for rulers. In trying to convince them to adopt a form of representative government, based on the rule of law, Mosiah spelled out all of the inherent risks and evils associated with having kings. Speaking to the Nephites, he said,

“Now I say unto you, that because all men are not just it is not expedient that ye should have a king or kings to rule over you. For behold, how much iniquity doth one wicked king cause to be committed, yea, and what great destruction! Yea, remember king Noah, his wickedness and his abominations, and also the wickedness and abominations of his people. Behold what great destruction did come upon them; and also because of their iniquities they were brought into bondage… and behold, now I say unto you, ye cannot dethrone an iniquitous king save it be through much contention, and the shedding of much blood. For behold, he has his friends in iniquity, and he keepeth his guards about him; and he teareth up the laws of those who have reigned in righteousness before him; and he trampleth under his feet the commandments of God; and he eneacteth laws, and sendeth them forth among his people, yea, laws after the manner of his own wickedness; and whosoever doth not obey his laws he causeth to be destroyed; and whosoever doth rebel against him he will send his armies against them to war, and if he can he will destroy them; and thus an unrighteous king doth pervert the ways of all righteousness. And now behold I say unto you, it is not expedient that such abominations should come upon you…

“And [King Mosiah] also unfolded unto them all the disadvantages they labored under, by having an unrighteous king to rule over them; Yea, all his iniquities and abominations, and all the wars, and contentions, and bloodshed, and the stealing, and the plundering, and the committing of whoredoms, and all manner of iniquities which cannot be enumerated – telling them that these things out not to be, that they were expressly repugnant to the commandments of God.” (Mosiah 29:16-18, 21-24, 35-36)

It is difficult to find a more apt description of statolatry than Mosiah’s comments that an unrighteous king “enacteth laws after the manner of his own wickedness [and] whosoever doth not his laws he causeth to be destroyed” (Mosiah 29:23). Seeking to replace God himself, an unrighteous king sets himself up as the standard, and destroys all that refuse to bow the knee in worshipping him.

The above was written by Christopher S. Bentley, in his book The Hidden Things of Darkness.


Feb 6 2008

The theme of the war in heaven

Many members of the Church easily recognize Satan’s role as a tempter of persons and as a figure who stands opposed to the plan of salvation. When we think of the war in heaven, we often, without giving it much thought, think it was simply a grand debate over whether we should follow God’s plan or whether we should follow Satan’s plan. While this is true, it is far too simplistic. We concentrate heavily on God’s plan, and we often fail to realize exactly what Satan’s plan was.

On the one hand, God’s plan was to send us to earth where we could learn and have experiences away from God’s direct influence. This would allow us to develop in ways not possible while still in his presence. If we lived righteously, we could return to Him and gain exaltation and eternal life.

God’s plan allowed for the use of free agency or choice. Whatever you call it, is the same thing: freedom.

On the other hand, Satan’s plan would force us all to act in whatever way Satan desired, also eventually to return to heaven.

God’s and Satan’s ideas were similar: they both desired for everyone to return to heaven after their probation on earth was finished. The major difference? God’s plan was to use freedom, while Satan’s was to use coercion. Satan’s plan, albeit philanthropic-sounding in its efforts to allow everyone to return to heaven, was so evil, due to its use of force, that Satan and his followers were cast out of heaven.

We are taught by our church leaders to liken scriptures and gospel principles to our lives. Satan’s false-philanthropy, as I like to call it, can be easily seen in today’s world, especially in the realm of law and politics.

For example, several of the people currently running to be the next president of the United States have plans to roll out a national form of health care service. These plans, like Satan’s, sound very nice: every person in the country would be covered for health-related expenses; every person would be taken care of. And the cost? We would all be taxed for it, involuntarily. We would be forced to participate, even if we didn’t want to pay for it. Allowing individuals choices within this system, eg., allowing them to pick their own doctors and providers, would still be the same kind of system, only with the facade of allowing for choice. Regardless, it would still be utilizing force.

As we approach the election season, and as we progress toward more and more socialistic proposals, let us keep these ideas in mind. No kind of paternalism, no matter how nice, pleasant, or otherwise philanthropic-sounding, is truly in accordance with the gospel of Jesus Christ, unless it is implemented voluntarily and people have total freedom as to whether they participate or not.

Any other system is operating under the same principle as what Satan proposed in the pre-existence.

[updated/edited for typos on 6 Apr 2009.]